AI Code Security Risks Nobody Talks About

A developer sits back and watches their screen fill with lines of code. Neatly structured, bug-free, and ready in seconds. The AI code builder has done in moments what used to take a team days. It feels like magic, but as the project moves closer to launch, something’s not quite right. Hidden deep in the logic are dependencies that don’t exist, credentials stored in plain text, and vulnerabilities no one expected.

Rapid speed is one of the biggest benefits of AI tools, but if you're not careful, subtle blind spots can creep in. Those unseen corners of automation hide early signs of risk that only appear after deployment. From AI-generated code vulnerabilities and unsafe dependencies to accountability gaps and hidden costs, these blind spots can quietly undermine project integrity. Let’s explore how to avoid these unseen security risks and why bespoke software development remains the safer, more sustainable path.

‍

The Risks Hidden in AI Generated Code

AI tools don’t just write code; they learn from the collective past of developers around the world. But they can also learn the wrong lessons. When trained on public code repositories, these systems absorb bad habits and insecure logic alongside best practices. The result is inherited flaws built into AI-generated code from day one.

Instead of creating entirely new risks, generative AI often resurfaces old vulnerabilities in new ways: insecure authentication, outdated encryption, and dependency mismanagement that open the door to future exploits. These flaws often blend seamlessly into otherwise functional code, making them difficult to detect until they cause real-world failures.

To mitigate risks of AI code generation, teams should perform deeper code analysis, implement secure architecture reviews, and validate all AI-generated outputs before deployment.

‍

Why Dependency on AI Tools Creates Vulnerability

Relying on AI to accelerate software development doesn’t just introduce technical risks; it also raises organisational and governance concerns. Businesses that fully integrate AI tools into their pipelines risk becoming dependent on vendors whose terms, pricing, or policies may change without notice. This vendor lock-in limits flexibility, slows innovation, and exposes sensitive data to compliance risks.

Most companies lack clear governance frameworks to audit how AI code is produced or to trace accountability when something goes wrong. In regulated sectors such as finance and healthcare, this lack of visibility can lead to compliance gaps and difficulties proving due diligence during audits.

To safeguard against these challenges, organisations should treat AI vendors as high-risk supply chain partners, requiring documentation, regular audits, and clear governance policies that ensure transparency and control.

‍

Common Security Gaps in Generative AI Coding

While common vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, hardcoded secrets, and insecure authentication are widely known, newer and less visible threats are emerging. One growing concern is phantom dependencies: references to non-existent libraries that AI models hallucinate during code generation. These can be exploited by attackers through slopsquatting, a supply chain attack where fake packages are registered under these names to inject malicious code.

AI-generated code can also amplify supply chain risks by recommending outdated or unverified libraries, increasing the chance of integrating compromised or deprecated components. In large-scale deployments, these vulnerabilities can spread rapidly through automated systems before anyone notices.

Combining automated vulnerability scanning with manual dependency validation helps reduce exposure. Maintaining a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) ensures visibility across every component, allowing teams to detect and resolve phantom or high-risk dependencies early.

‍

How AI Code Builders Weaken Software Protection

AI builders can streamline repetitive coding tasks, but their lack of context awareness makes them unreliable for security-critical systems. Many tools cannot interpret the regulatory, architectural, or business logic required for compliant, secure software. And as mentioned above, primary AI code security risks in highly regulated industries are inadvertently exposing sensitive data or breaching industry standards.

Over time, dependency on AI also reduces human scrutiny. Teams start trusting machine-generated logic over their own, which can create blind spots and foster a false sense of security. When AI-generated code introduces subtle bugs, they can cascade across systems, amplifying vulnerabilities and making remediation far more difficult.

From an organisational standpoint, this dependency weakens internal capability and increases long-term software development risk. The absence of accountability mechanisms compounds the issue, leaving teams unsure where responsibility lies when things go wrong.

‍

The Hidden Costs of Relying on AI Code Builders

The initial savings and speed of AI automation often mask the long-term costs. Inconsistent or inefficient AI-generated code leads to greater maintenance complexity and technical debt. Debugging, patching, and revalidating AI code can quickly erode any time saved during development.

There are also commercial and legal implications. Dependency on AI platforms introduces ongoing licensing costs and portability issues if a vendor changes its terms. In addition, intellectual property ownership becomes murky when AI-generated code incorporates material from training data that may be copyrighted or improperly licensed.

These costs and risks combine to form the true dependency trap: short-term efficiency at the expense of long-term resilience.

‍

Building Safer Code Beyond AI Generated Tools

AI builders aren’t inherently unsafe, but they expose blind spots that many teams fail to see until it’s too late. Closing those gaps requires human oversight, consistent validation, and a clear understanding of where automation ends and accountability begins.

Evolved Ideas helps organisations uncover and eliminate these hidden risks before they become problems. Through transparent processes, expert code reviews, and governance-led development, we empower businesses to build confidently and securely in the age of AI.

As Colette Wyatt, CEO of Evolved Ideas, explains: “AI accelerates innovation, but it can’t replace the experience needed to see what automation misses. Our role is to help organisations spot those blind spots early and turn them into opportunities for stronger, safer software.”

FAQs

What are the biggest security risks of using AI code builders?

They can introduce insecure dependencies, phantom packages, and compliance risks that go unnoticed without proper oversight.

‍

How can organisations protect against AI-generated vulnerabilities?

Combine AI tools with human expertise, regular code reviews, and continuous dependency scanning to catch and fix blind spots early.

‍

‍Why is bespoke development safer than relying solely on AI?

It ensures ownership, visibility, and tailored security practices, avoiding vendor lock-in and the hidden costs of AI dependency.

‍